Rubric-based rewards offer interpretable and fine-grained optimization signals for reinforcement learning in open-ended tasks where verifiable answers are unavailable. However, pre-constructed rubrics remain static throughout training, creating a fundamental mismatch with the evolving policy: fixed criteria gradually lose discriminative power as the model improves, leading to reward saturation and potential hacking. Recent dynamic rubric methods partially address this but rely on external frontier models or ground-truth answers, and update rubrics only at coarse granularity. We propose EvoRubrics, a co-evolutionary RL framework where a Policy LLM and a Rubric Generator jointly improve through adversarial interaction within each training step. As the policy improves under the rubric generator’s guidance, the rubric generator adapts its criteria to remain discriminative and informative, enabling evaluation to track the policy in real time and naturally inducing an automatic curriculum. Experiments show that EvoRubrics consistently outperforms static and dynamic rubric baselines across benchmarks. The learned Rubric Generator further generalizes as a transferable reward model. Notably, even a fully self-supervised variant without any external supervision achieves meaningful gains, suggesting that co-evolution between generation and evaluation alone can provide sufficiently rich learning signals. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/huangbaixiang100/EvoRubrics.

Personality detection aims to label an individual’s traits via identifying linguistic cues from his or her written text. Previous approaches typically perform a direct mapping between text and trait labels or apply static reasoning to this task.In this paper, we argue that dynamic reasoning, underpinned by psychological theory, is essential for personality trait inference. To address this, we propose PsyPath, a novel framework that models personality detection as a process of psychologically-guided self-exploration. By enabling large language models (LLMs) to dynamically generate and answer psychologically meaningful questions, our method creates a dynamic reasoning path to explore the underlying dimensions of personality traits. This mechanism not only makes the reasoning process transparent, but also helps the model understand personality nuances in a way that mirrors expert psychological reasoning.For the “guided self-exploration”, we propose a novel hybrid scoring mechanism to step-by-step evaluate the generated nodes in the reasoning paths that balances psychological coherence (black-box scoring) and model output dynamics (white-box scoring). This reasoning-based formulation inherently reflects how psychologists assess personality, as they rely on iterative, diagnostic reasoning. Experiments on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that PsyPath consistently outperforms strong baselines, yielding improvements in predictive accuracy and model interpretability.Moreover, the generated reasoning paths provide psychologically meaningful training data, significantly improving performance and psychologically grounded interpretability in downstream tasks.

Large language models drop in performance when their context contains semantic distractors: context topically related to the question but off the reasoning chain. Prior mechanistic work tracks a single injected distractor token, missing failures in which the model predicts other context tokens or out-of-context but topically related ones. We instead track the model’s actual top non-gold prediction, providing a localization target for every observed top-1 failure in the analyzed subset. Failures converge on a small set of mid-to-late-layer answer-selection heads (AS-Heads): patching their clean outputs into distracting runs recovers 60-86\\%$ of failed predictions across four base models from two families (random heads recover $\leq 8\\%$), with the mechanism also replicating in two instruction-tuned models. Clean-prompt ablations indicate that these heads also contribute to normal answer selection, so their role is not specific to distractors. Redirecting their attention onto an entity span causes the model to transcribe that span at $22$-$83\\%$ (vs. $\leq 7.4\\%$ for random heads), establishing a causally consequential intervention point. The localized heads transfer across MuSiQue, HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and non-Wikipedia RAG settings. At inference, their attention provides a training-free context-filtering signal that lifts F1 by up to $+35$ points on disrupted samples and is competitive with retrieval-head methods.

Block diffusion speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference by predicting all tokens within a block simultaneously for the target model to verify in parallel. Predicting an entire block at once requires a sufficiently capable draft model and effective utilization of the target model’s internal knowledge. However, the state-of-the-art method DFlash constrains all draft layers to share a single fused representation derived from only a few target layers, limiting per-layer expressiveness and hindering further scaling of draft capacity. In this paper, we present DFLare, which flares out the narrow conditioning bottleneck of DFlash through a lightweight layer-wise fusion mechanism: each draft layer attends to its own learnable combination of a broad set of target layers at negligible overhead, simultaneously injecting richer target knowledge and providing every draft layer with a distinct input. This enhanced per-layer expressiveness enables scaling the draft model to deeper architectures with consistent gains. We further scale training data from 800K to 2.4M samples to fully exploit the enlarged capacity. On six benchmarks spanning mathematical reasoning, code generation, and conversation, DFLare attains average wall-clock speedups of 5.52x on Qwen3-4B, 5.46x on Qwen3-8B, and 3.91x on GPT-OSS-20B, improving over DFlash by roughly 11%, 8%, and 5% respectively.

Interactive medical questioning is essential in clinical consultations, where physicians must actively gather necessary patient information. Yet existing medical Large Language Models (LLMs) predominantly follow a reactive paradigm, risking diagnostic errors by answering before seeking sufficient details. To bridge this gap, we propose ProMed, a reinforcement learning framework that transitions LLMs toward a proactive paradigm, enabling them to ask clinically valuable questions before decision-making. Central to ProMed is the Shapley Information Gain (SIG) reward, which quantifies a question’s clinical utility as the amount of newly acquired information, while considering its contextual importance via Shapley values. We integrate SIG into a two-stage training pipeline: (1) SIG-Guided Model Initialization uses Monte Carlo Tree Search to construct high-reward interaction trajectories for supervision, and (2) SIG-Augmented Policy Optimization, with a novel SIG-guided Reward Distribution Mechanism that prioritizes informative questions for fine-grained optimization. Experiments on partial-information medical benchmarks show that ProMed significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods by 6.29% on average and delivers a 54.45% gain over the reactive paradigm, and generalizes robustly to out-of-domain cases. Our codes are available at https://github.com/hxxding/ProMed.