Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have attracted significant research interest. However, the open-source community faces many challenges in developing specialized models for agent tasks, driven by the scarcity of high-quality agent datasets and the absence of standard protocols in this area. We introduce xLAM, a series of large action models designed for AI agent tasks. The xLAM series includes five models with both dense and mixture-of-expert architectures, ranging from 1B to 8x22B parameters, trained using a scalable, flexible pipeline that unifies, augments, and synthesizes diverse datasets to enhance AI agents’ generalizability and performance across varied environments. Our experimental results demonstrate that xLAM consistently delivers exceptional performance across multiple agent ability benchmarks, notably securing the 1st position on the Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard, outperforming GPT-4, Claude-3, and many other models in terms of tool use. By releasing the xLAM series, we aim to advance the performance of open-source LLMs for autonomous AI agents, potentially accelerating progress and democratizing access to high-performance models for agent tasks.

Personalization is essential for AI assistants, especially in private AI settings where models are expected to interpret users’ personal data (e.g., conversations, app usage) to understand their background, preferences, and social context. However, due to privacy concerns, existing academic research lacks direct access to such data, making benchmarking difficult. To fill this gap, we propose a synthetic data pipeline that generates realistic user profiles and private documents, enabling the creation of PersonaBench—a benchmark for evaluating models’ ability to understand personal information. Using this benchmark, we assess Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines on personalized questions and find that current models struggle to accurately extract and answer questions even when provided with the full set of user documents, highlighting the need for improved personalization methods.

While open-source vision-language models perform well on simple question-answering, they still struggle with complex questions that require both perceptual and reasoning capabilities. We propose LATTE, a family of vision-language models that have LeArned to Think wiTh vision spEcialists. By offloading perception to state-of-the-art vision models, our approach enables vision-language models to focus solely on reasoning over high-quality perceptual information. To train LATTE, we synthesize and filter a large dataset of 293K multi-modal reasoning traces over perceptual outputs of vision specialists. LATTE trained on this data achieves significant 4-5% gains over baselines across 6 benchmarks covering both perception and reasoning abilities. Ablation studies reveal that the effectiveness of multi-modal reasoning traces depends on the data sources, formats, and quality of thoughts.

Large Action models are essential for enabling autonomous agents to perform complex tasks. However, training such models remains challenging due to the diversity of agent environments and the complexity of noisy agentic data. Existing infrastructure offers limited support for scalable, agent-specific fine-tuning and standardized agent data processing. We introduce ActionStudio, a lightweight and extensible data and training framework designed for large action models. ActionStudio unifies diverse agent trajectories using our proposed Unified Format 2.0, supports a range of training workflows with optimized multi-node distributed setup, and integrates robust preprocessing and real-time verification tools. ActionStudio demonstrates up to 9× higher throughput compared to existing agentic training frameworks, and our trained models yield top performances across public and realistic agent benchmarks. To support the broader research community, we open-source the ActionStudio framework and release actionstudio-98k, a curated dataset of 98k high-quality trajectories.

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, organizations are turning to AI agents to automate tasks, streamline business operations, and improve decision-making processes. However, despite the flexibility offered by existing libraries, the developed agents often struggle with integration into organizational workflows, resulting in limited daily usage for work. In this paper, we present SlackAgents, a multi-agent library for scalable management and collaboration of AI agents on Slack. As an agentic layer developed upon the Slack platform, the framework offers instant AI integration into organizational workflows and enables AI-powered automation of real daily tasks. Furthermore, SLACKAGENTS facilitates scalable collaboration, allowing for effective communication and task orchestration. Our solution bridges existing gaps, offering a robust platform for developing, deploying and managing AI agents for workplace environments.

The rapid adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) as intelligent agents has underscored the necessity for robust evaluation frameworks capable of assessing agent performance in realistic, interactive environments. Existing evaluation methodologies often suffer from limitations such as static task benchmarks, limited scope, and inadequate integration with practical applications. In response, we introduce MCPEval, an open-source, Model Context Protocol (MCP)-based evaluation framework specifically tailored for comprehensive and systematic assessment of LLM-powered agents. MCPEval standardizes evaluations across diverse domains through automated task generation and verification, supports multiple performance metrics, and integrates seamlessly with native agent capabilities. We empirically validate the effectiveness of MCPEval across five distinct real-world domains, highlighting significant variations in performance across various LLM architectures and prompting strategies. Our results illustrate the framework’s capacity to uncover nuanced performance patterns and identify domain-specific strengths and weaknesses, providing valuable insights beyond traditional binary success metrics. We publicly release MCPEval to foster reproducible research and promote standardized evaluation practices within the LLM agent community.

Despite advancements in conversational AI, language models encounter challenges to handle diverse conversational tasks, and existing dialogue dataset collections often lack diversity and comprehensiveness. To tackle these issues, we introduce DialogStudio: the largest and most diverse collection of dialogue datasets, unified under a consistent format while preserving their original information. Our collection encompasses data from open-domain dialogues, task-oriented dialogues, natural language understanding, conversational recommendation, dialogue summarization, and knowledge-grounded dialogues, making it an incredibly rich and diverse resource for dialogue research and model training.To further enhance the utility of DialogStudio, we identify the licenses for each dataset, design external knowledge and domain-aware prompts for selected dialogues to facilitate instruction-aware fine-tuning. To improve transparency and support dataset and task-based research, as well as language model pre-training, all datasets, licenses, codes, and models associated with DialogStudio will be made publicly accessible.

While both extractive and generative readers have been successfully applied to the Question Answering (QA) task, little attention has been paid toward the systematic comparison of them. Characterizing the strengths and weaknesses of the two readers is crucial not only for making a more informed reader selection in practice but also for developing a deeper understanding to foster further research on improving readers in a principled manner. Motivated by this goal, we make the first attempt to systematically study the comparison of extractive and generative readers for question answering. To be aligned with the state-of-the-art, we explore nine transformer-based large pre-trained language models (PrLMs) as backbone architectures. Furthermore, we organize our findings under two main categories: (1) keeping the architecture invariant, and (2) varying the underlying PrLMs. Among several interesting findings, it is important to highlight that (1) the generative readers perform better in long context QA, (2) the extractive readers perform better in short context while also showing better out-of-domain generalization, and (3) the encoder of encoder-decoder PrLMs (e.g., T5) turns out to be a strong extractive reader and outperforms the standard choice of encoder-only PrLMs (e.g., RoBERTa). We also study the effect of multi-task learning on the two types of readers varying the underlying PrLMs and perform qualitative and quantitative diagnosis to provide further insights into future directions in modeling better readers.