LLM-based web agents automate browser interactions by generating structured action sequences, yet their deployment in long-horizon tasks is hindered by fragile error propagation in noisy DOM trees. Critically, existing training paradigms rely exclusively on positive supervision from gold demonstrations, teaching models **what** is correct but never **why** plausible alternatives fail, leaving agents unable to distinguish between subtly different yet critically divergent choices. We propose **FailAlign**, a failure-aligned learning framework that systematically integrates error signals as first-class training supervision. We mine a Failure Index from model rollouts by pinpointing first-error steps, then leverage these instances across a three-stage pipeline: (i) action-grounded context compression distills verbose HTML into compact DOM snippets; (ii) hard-negative DPO pairs gold actions with semantically similar incorrect alternatives to sharpen decision boundaries; (iii) trajectory-level GRPO mitigates error cascades by re-simulating corrected trajectories. On Mind2Web with Qwen3-32B, FailAlign achieves **49.7% SSR** and **5.6% SR**, surpassing models 15× larger (Qwen3-Coder-480B: 37.0% SSR) and commercial systems (Claude Opus-4.5: 39.4% SSR), validating the efficacy of learning from failures.

While large language models (LLMs) have mastered syntax-level code generation, complex algorithmic reasoning remains a challenge, typically addressed by scaling model depth and parameter count. Universal Transformers (UT) offer a compelling alternative by introducing a recurrent inductive bias that aligns with the recursive nature of programming logic. However, training looped architectures at scale has historically been hindered by severe instability and optimization difficulties associated with backpropagation through time (BPTT). We present LoopCoder (40B-A80B) pre-trained on 12T+ code and general tokens, along with LoopCoder-Thinking and LoopCoder-Instruct variants—the first large-scale looped transformer for code, achieving comparable performance to standard dense architectures with more parameters. Unlike prior approaches that restrict recurrence to small-scale tasks, we implement a comprehensive looped training protocol spanning both pre-training and post-training phases. We initiate the model via dense-to-loop transformation, folding a pre-trained dense checkpoint to initialize a recurrent block, followed by rigorous looped pre-training and specialized post-training for instruction following and reasoning. Our results establish a robust recipe for scaling coding intelligence via recurrent computation, proving that dense checkpoints serve as an optimal foundation for evolving into dynamic, looped reasoners.

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful but costly to train, with scaling laws predicting performance from model size, data, and compute. However, different programming languages (PLs) have varying impacts during pre-training that significantly affect base model performance, leading to inaccurate performance prediction. Existing works focus on language-agnostic settings, neglecting the inherently multilingual nature of modern software development. Therefore, it is first necessary to investigate the scaling laws of different PLs, and then consider their mutual influences to arrive at the final multilingual scaling law. In this paper, we present the first systematic exploration of scaling laws for multilingual code pre-training, conducting over 1000+ experiments (Equivalent to 336,000+ H800 hours) across multiple PLs, model sizes (0.2B to 14B parameters), and dataset sizes (1T tokens). We establish scaling laws for code LLMs across multiple programming languages, showing that interpreted languages benefit more from increased scale than compiled ones. Multilingual pre-training provides synergistic benefits, especially between syntactically similar languages, with parallel pairing (concatenating code with translations) significantly enhancing cross-lingual abilities. We propose a proportion-dependent multilingual scaling law that optimally allocates training tokens by prioritizing high-utility languages (e.g., Python), balancing high-synergy pairs (e.g., JavaScript-TypeScript), and reducing allocation to fast-saturating languages (e.g., Rust), achieving superior performance across all languages compared to uniform distribution.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code generation tasks. However, their effectiveness heavily relies on supervised training with extensive labeled (e.g., question-answering pairs) or unlabeled datasets (e.g., code snippets), which are often expensive and difficult to obtain at scale. To address this limitation, this paper introduces a method IPC, an unsupervised framework that leverages Internal Probing of LLMs for Code generation without any external corpus, even unlabeled code snippets. We introduce the problem space probing, test understanding probing, solution space probing, and knowledge consolidation and reinforcement to probe the internal knowledge and confidence patterns existing in LLMs. Further, IPC identifies reliable code candidates through self-consistency mechanisms and representation-based quality estimation to train UCoder (coder with unsupervised learning). We validate the proposed approach across multiple code benchmarks, demonstrating that unsupervised methods can achieve competitive performance compared to supervised approaches while significantly reducing the dependency on labeled data and computational resources. Analytic experiments reveal that internal model states contain rich signals about code quality and correctness, and that properly harnessing these signals enables effective unsupervised learning for code generation tasks, opening new directions for training code LLMs in resource-constrained scenarios.

Tables present unique challenges for language models due to their structured row-column interactions, necessitating specialized approaches for effective comprehension. While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in table reasoning through prompting and techniques like chain-of-thought (CoT) and program-of-thought (PoT), optimizing their performance for table question answering remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce region-based Table-R1, a novel reinforcement learning approach that enhances LLM table understanding by integrating region evidence into reasoning steps. Our method employs Region-Enhanced Supervised Fine-Tuning (RE-SFT) to guide models in identifying relevant table regions before generating answers, incorporating textual, symbolic, and program-based reasoning. Additionally, Table-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (TARPO) introduces a mixed reward system to dynamically balance region accuracy and answer correctness, with decaying region rewards and consistency penalties to align reasoning steps. Experiments show that Table-R1 achieves an average performance improvement of 14.36 points across multiple base models on three benchmark datasets, even outperforming baseline models with ten times the number of parameters, while TARPO significantly reduces the reasoning token consumption by 67.5% compared to GRPO, significantly advancing LLM capabilities in efficient tabular reasoning.

Tabular data is a fundamental component of real-world information systems. However, existing multilingual table benchmarks suffer from geolinguistic imbalance - overrepresenting certain languages and lacking sufficient scale for rigorous cross-lingual analysis. To address these limitations, we introduce M3TQA, which is a comprehensive framework for massively multilingual multitask table question answering, including subsequent datasets M3TQA-BENCH and M3TQA-INSTRUCT, featuring tables expanded to 97 languages from Chinese and English sources. M3TQA-BENCH includes 6,606 professionally annotated question-answering pairs across four tasks designed to evaluate nuanced table reasoning capabilities. Additionally, we synthesized the training set M3TQA-INSTRUCT in 97 languages using Large Language Model (LLM). Experiments on state-of-the-art LLMs reveal critical insights into cross-lingual generalization, demonstrating that synthetically generated, unannotated training data can significantly boost performance, particularly for low-resource languages. M3TQA establishes a new standard for multilingual table understanding, providing both a challenging evaluation platform and a scalable methodology for future research.

Code large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in code debugging by directly generating the correct code based on the buggy code snippet. Programming benchmarks, typically consisting of buggy code snippets and their associated test cases, are used to assess the debugging capabilities of LLMs. However, many existing benchmarks primarily focus on Python and are often limited in terms of language diversity (e.g., DebugBench and DebugEval). To advancethe field of multilingual debugging with LLMs, we propose the first massively multilingual debugging benchmark, which includes 3.9K test samples of 20 programming languages and covers the automated program repair (APR) task, the bug localization(BL) task, and the bug identification (BI) task. In addition, we introduce the debugging instruction corpora MdEval-Instruct by injecting bugs into the correct multilingual queries and solutions (xDebugGen). Further, a multilingual debugger xDebugCoder trained on MdEval-Instruct as a strong baseline specifically to handle bugs of a wide range of programming languages (e.g. “Missing Mut” in language Rust and “Misused Macro Definition” in language C). Our extensive experiments on MdEval reveal a notable performance gap between open-source and closed-source LLMs (e.g., GPT and Claudeseries), highlighting huge room for improvement in multilingual code debugging scenarios.

The rapid advancement of code large language models (LLMs) has sparked significant research interest in systematically evaluating their code generation capabilities, yet existing benchmarks predominantly assess models at a single structural granularity and focus on limited programming languages, obscuring fine-grained capability variations across different code scopes and multilingual scenarios. We introduce M²G-Eval, a multi-granularity, multilingual framework for evaluating code generation in large language models (LLMs) across four levels: Class, Function, Block, and Line. Spanning 18 programming languages, M²G-Eval includes 17K+ training tasks and 1,286 human-annotated, contamination-controlled test instances. We develop M²G-Eval-Coder models by training Qwen3-8B with supervised fine-tuning and Group Relative Policy Optimization. Evaluating 30 models (28 state-of-the-art LLMs plus our two M²G-Eval-Coder variants) reveals three main findings: (1) an apparent difficulty hierarchy, with Line-level tasks easiest and Class-level most challenging; (2) widening performance gaps between full- and partial-granularity languages as task complexity increases; and (3) strong cross-language correlations, suggesting that models learn transferable programming concepts. M²G-Eval enables fine-grained diagnosis of code generation capabilities and highlights persistent challenges in synthesizing complex, long-form code.

Despite the significant advancement of LLMs in conversation summarization, their evaluation remains limited by insufficient scenarios, input lengths, and sample sizes. Furthermore, existing benchmarks often omit frontier reasoning systems and efficient small models, or lack fine-grained, multi-dimensional assessments. To bridge these gaps, we propose OmniCSEval, a unified benchmark comprising 1,800 diverse conversations across six real-world scenarios, featuring context lengths ranging from 128 to 32k tokens. For fine-grained evaluation, we employ a bidirectional fact-checking framework that integrates key fact matching to assess completeness and conciseness, alongside summary fact verification to evaluate faithfulness. To ensure reliable assessment, we establish a human-LLM collaborative pipeline for key fact extraction and a multi-LLM consensus verifier for summary fact decomposition. Leveraging this framework, we evaluate 28 LLMs across four distinct categories grouped by reasoning capability and model scale. Our extensive empirical study reveals critical insights regarding the cross-scenario challenges current LLMs continue to face, the impacts of reasoning and scale, and the efficiency and adaptability of reasoning models. We also provide guidance for system selection in real-world deployments.

Industrial code tasks, including chip design, GPU optimization, and firmware, often fail for reasons that are invisible in ordinary source code: timing constraints, backend logs, layout data, simulator behavior, and hardware-specific performance trade-offs. Current code models see many programs but few expert correction traces from these settings. We present InCoder-32B-Thinking, a 32B thinking code model trained with Error-driven Chain-of-Thought (ECoT) synthesis and an Industrial Code World Model (ICWM). ECoT converts several rounds of toolchain signals into reasoning traces by preserving the failed code, the observed failure, and the later fix. ICWM learns from execution traces in domains such as Verilog simulation and GPU profiling, then predicts feedback for the data engine, which can build more repair traces without routing every candidate through a real toolchain. The data keeps the uneven reasoning depth of industrial work: short traces for simple cases, long traces for hardware-level debugging. Across 23 tests (14 general and 9 industrial), InCoder-32B-Thinking reaches 81.3% on LiveCodeBench v5, 84.0% CAD-Coder compile success, and 38.0% on KernelBench L2, while remaining competitive on general coding tasks. Model weights and code are available at Hugging Face: https://huggingface.co/Multilingual-Multimodal-NLP/IndustrialCoder and GitHub: https://github.com/CSJianYang/Industrial-Coder.

Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) with missing modalities has attracted increasing attention recently. While current Transformer-based methods leverage dense text information to maintain model robustness, their quadratic complexity hinders efficient long-range modeling and multimodal fusion. To this end, we propose a novel and efficient Text-enhanced Fusion Mamba (TF-Mamba) framework for robust MSA with missing modalities. Specifically, a Text-aware Modality Enhancement (TME) module aligns and enriches non-text modalities, while reconstructing the missing text semantics. Moreover, we develop Text-based Context Mamba (TC-Mamba) to capture intra-modal contextual dependencies under text collaboration. Finally, Text-guided Query Mamba (TQ-Mamba) queries text-guided multimodal information and learns joint representations for sentiment prediction. Extensive experiments on three MSA datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed method under missing modality scenarios. Code is available at https://github.com/codemous/TF-Mamba.

Code large language models (LLMs) enhance programming by understanding and generating code across languages, offering intelligent feedback, bug detection, and code updates through reflection, improving development efficiency and accessibility. While benchmarks (e.g. HumanEval/LiveCodeBench) evaluate code generation and real-world relevance, previous works ignores the scenario of modifying code in repositories. Considering challenges remaining in improving reflection capabilities and avoiding data contamination in dynamic benchmarks, we introduce , a challenging benchmark for evaluating code understanding and generation in multi-file repository contexts, featuring 1,888 rigorously filtered test cases across 6 programming languages to ensure diversity, correctness, and high difficulty. Further, we create , a large-scale, quality-filtered instruction-tuning dataset derived from diverse sources, used to train through a two-turn dialogue process involving code generation and error-driven repair. The leaderboard evaluates over 40 LLMs to reflect the model performance of repository-based code reflection.

With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), recent researchers have increasingly focused on the superior capabilities of LLMs in text/code understanding and generation to tackle text-to-SQL tasks. Traditional approaches adopt schema linking to first eliminate redundant tables and columns and prompt LLMs for SQL generation. However, they often struggle with accurately identifying corresponding tables and columns, due to discrepancies in naming conventions between natural language questions (NL) and database schemas. Besides, existing methods overlook the challenge of effectively transforming structure information from NL into SQL. To address these limitations, we introduce UCS-SQL, a novel text-to-SQL framework, uniting both content and structure pipes to bridge the gap between NL and SQL. Specifically, the content pipe focuses on identifying key content within the original content, while the structure pipe is dedicated to transforming the linguistic structure from NL to SQL. Additionally, we strategically selects few-shot examples by considering both the SQL Skeleton and Question Expression (SS-QE selection method), thus providing targeted examples for SQL generation. Experimental results on BIRD and Spider demonstrate the effectiveness of our UCS-SQL framework.

While large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable promise in code generation, real-world software development demands advanced repository-level reasoning. This includes understanding dependencies, project structures, and managing multi-file changes. However, the ability of LLMs to effectively comprehend and handle complex code repositories has yet to be fully explored. To address these challenges, we introduce a hierarchical benchmark designed to evaluate repository dependency understanding(DependEval) for LLMs. The benchmark is based on 2683 repositories collected from real-world websites. It evaluates models on three core tasks: Dependency Recognition, Repository Construction, and Multi-file Editing, across 8 programming languages from actual code repositories. Our evaluation of over 25 LLMs reveals substantial performance gaps and provides valuable insights into repository-level code understanding.

Recently, advancements in large multimodal models have led to significant strides in image comprehension capabilities. Despite these advancements, there is a lack of a robust benchmark specifically for assessing the image‐to‐web conversion proficiency of these large models. It is essential to ensure the integrity of the web elements generated, which comprise both visible and invisible categories. Previous evaluation methods (e.g., BLEU) are notably susceptible to significant alterations due to the presence of invisible elements. Furthermore, it is crucial to measure the layout information of web pages—i.e., the positional relationships between elements—which has been overlooked by prior work. To address these challenges, we have curated and aligned a benchmark of images and corresponding web codes (IW-bench). Specifically, we propose Element Accuracy, which tests the completeness of elements by parsing the Document Object Model (DOM) tree. We also introduce Layout Accuracy to analyze positional relationships by converting the DOM tree into a common subsequence. In addition, we design a five‐hop multimodal Chain‐of‐Thought prompting strategy for improved performance, consisting of: 1) SoM prompt injection, 2) inferring elements, 3) inferring layout, 4) inferring web code, and 5) reflection. Our benchmark comprises 1,200 image–code pairs with varying levels of difficulty. We have conducted extensive experiments on existing large multimodal models, providing insights into their performance and identifying areas for improvement in the image‐to‐web domain.

We present CodeArena to emulate the complexity/diversity of real-world coding tasks, spanning 40 categories and 44 PLs. A 20B diverse synthetic instruction corpus is created by scaling instructions to help Qwen2.5-SynCoder achieve SOTA performance. Abstract: Code large language models (codeLLMs) have made significant strides in code generation. Most previous code-related benchmarks, which consist of various programming exercises along with the corresponding test cases, are used as a common measure to evaluate the performance and capabilities of code LLMs. However, the current code LLMs focus on synthesizing the correct code snippet, ignoring the alignment with human preferences, where the query should be sampled from the practical application scenarios and the model-generated responses should satisfy the human preference. To bridge the gap between the model-generated response and human preference, we present a rigorous human-curated benchmark CodeArena to emulate the complexity and diversity of real-world coding tasks, where 397 high-quality samples spanning 40 categories and 44 programming languages, carefully curated from user queries. Further, we propose a diverse synthetic instruction corpus SynCode-Instruct (nearly 20B tokens) by scaling instructions from the website to verify the effectiveness of the large-scale synthetic instruction fine-tuning, where Qwen2.5-SynCoder totally trained on synthetic instruction data can achieve top-tier performance of open-source code LLMs. The results find performance differences between execution-based benchmarks and CodeArena. Our systematic experiments of CodeArena on 40+ LLMs reveal a notable performance gap between open SOTA code LLMs (e.g. Qwen2.5-Coder) and proprietary LLMs (e.g., OpenAI o1), underscoring the importance of the human preference alignment.

With the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs), the demand for robust instruction-following capabilities in code generation tasks has grown significantly. Code generation not only facilitates faster prototyping and automated testing, but also augments developer efficiency through improved maintainability and reusability of code. In this paper, we introduce CodeIF, the first benchmark specifically designed to assess the abilities of LLMs to adhere to task-oriented instructions within diverse code generation scenarios. CodeIF encompasses a broad range of tasks, including function synthesis, error debugging, algorithmic refactoring, and code explanation, thereby providing a comprehensive suite to evaluate model performance across varying complexity levels and programming domains. We conduct extensive experiments with LLMs, analyzing their strengths and limitations in meeting the demands of these tasks. The experimental results offer valuable insights into how well current models align with human instructions, as well as the extent to which they can generate consistent, maintainable, and contextually relevant code. Our findings not only underscore the critical role that instruction-following LLMs can play in modern software development, but also illuminate pathways for future research aimed at enhancing their adaptability, reliability, and overall effectiveness in automated code generation.

Despite advances in unsupervised log anomaly detection, current models require dataset-specific training, causing costly procedures, limited scalability, and performance bottlenecks. Furthermore, numerous models lack cognitive reasoning abilities, limiting their transferability to similar systems. Additionally, these models often encounter the “identical shortcut” predicament, erroneously predicting normal classes when confronted with rare anomaly logs due to reconstruction errors. To address these issues, we propose MLAD, a novel Multi-system Log Anomaly Detection model incorporating semantic relational reasoning. Specifically, we extract cross-system semantic patterns and encode them as high-dimensional learnable vectors. Subsequently, we revamp attention formulas to discern keyword significance and model the overall distribution through vector space diffusion. Lastly, we employ a Gaussian mixture model to highlight rare word uncertainty, optimizing the vector space with maximum expectation. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of MLAD.

There has been increasing interest in exploring the capabilities of advanced large language models (LLMs) in the field of information extraction (IE), specifically focusing on tasks related to named entity recognition (NER) and relation extraction (RE). Although researchers are exploring the use of few-shot information extraction through in-context learning with LLMs, they tend to focus only on using correct or positive examples for demonstration, neglecting the potential value of incorporating incorrect or negative examples into the learning process. In this paper, we present C-ICL, a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations. This approach enhances the ability of LLMs to extract entities and relations by utilizing prompts that incorporate not only the positive samples but also the reasoning behind them. This method allows for the identification and correction of potential interface errors. Specifically, our proposed method taps into the inherent contextual information and valuable information in hard negative samples and the nearest positive neighbors to the test and then applies the in-context learning demonstrations based on LLMs. Our experiments on various datasets indicate that C-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods, delivering substantial enhancements in performance across a broad spectrum of related tasks. These improvements are noteworthy, showcasing the versatility of our approach in miscellaneous scenarios.

Root cause analysis (RCA) in Micro-services architecture (MSA) with escalating complexity encounters complex challenges in maintaining system stability and efficiency due to fault propagation and circular dependencies among nodes. Diverse root cause analysis faults require multi-agents with diverse expertise. To mitigate the hallucination problem of large language models (LLMs), we design blockchain-inspired voting to ensure the reliability of the analysis by using a decentralized decision-making process. To avoid non-terminating loops led by common circular dependency in MSA, we objectively limit steps and standardize task processing through Agent Workflow. We propose a pioneering framework, multi-Agent Blockchain-inspired Collaboration for root cause analysis in micro-services architecture (mABC), where multiple agents based on the powerful LLMs follow Agent Workflow and collaborate in blockchain-inspired voting. Specifically, seven specialized agents derived from Agent Workflow each provide valuable insights towards root cause analysis based on their expertise and the intrinsic software knowledge of LLMs collaborating within a decentralized chain. Our experiments on the AIOps challenge dataset and a newly created Train-Ticket dataset demonstrate superior performance in identifying root causes and generating effective resolutions. The ablation study further highlights Agent Workflow, multi-agent, and blockchain-inspired voting is crucial for achieving optimal performance. mABC offers a comprehensive automated root cause analysis and resolution in micro-services architecture and significantly improves the IT Operation domain.

As one of the most popular parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is commonly applied to fine-tune large language models (LLMs). However, updating the weights of LoRA blocks effectively and expeditiously is challenging due to the long calculation path in the original model. To address this, we propose ResLoRA, an improved framework of LoRA. By adding residual paths during training and using merging approaches to eliminate these extra paths during inference, our method can achieve better results in fewer training steps without any extra trainable parameters or inference cost compared to LoRA. The experiments on NLG, NLU, and text-to-image tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. To the best of our knowledge, ResLoRA is the first work that combines the residual path with LoRA. The code of our method is available at this url.

Relation extraction is a key task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), which aims to extract relations between entity pairs from given texts. Recently, relation extraction (RE) has achieved remarkable progress with the development of deep neural networks. Most existing research focuses on constructing explicit structured features using external knowledge such as knowledge graph and dependency tree. In this paper, we propose a novel method to extract multi-granularity features based solely on the original input sentences. We show that effective structured features can be attained even without external knowledge. Three kinds of features based on the input sentences are fully exploited, which are in entity mention level, segment level, and sentence level. All the three are jointly and hierarchically modeled. We evaluate our method on three public benchmarks: SemEval 2010 Task 8, Tacred, and Tacred Revisited. To verify the effectiveness, we apply our method to different encoders such as LSTM and BERT. Experimental results show that our method significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art models that even use external knowledge. Extensive analyses demonstrate that the performance of our model is contributed by the capture of multi-granularity features and the model of their hierarchical structure.

Although pre-trained language models (PLMs) have achieved great success and become a milestone in NLP, abstractive conversational summarization remains a challenging but less studied task. The difficulty lies in two aspects. One is the lack of large-scale conversational summary data. Another is that applying the existing pre-trained models to this task is tricky because of the structural dependence within the conversation and its informal expression, etc. In this work, we first build a large-scale (11M) pretraining dataset called RCSum, based on the multi-person discussions in the Reddit community. We then present TANet, a thread-aware Transformer-based network. Unlike the existing pre-trained models that treat a conversation as a sequence of sentences, we argue that the inherent contextual dependency among the utterances plays an essential role in understanding the entire conversation and thus propose two new techniques to incorporate the structural information into our model. The first is thread-aware attention which is computed by taking into account the contextual dependency within utterances. Second, we apply thread prediction loss to predict the relations between utterances. We evaluate our model on four datasets of real conversations, covering types of meeting transcripts, customer-service records, and forum threads. Experimental results demonstrate that TANet achieves a new state-of-the-art in terms of both automatic evaluation and human judgment.

The robustness of Text-to-SQL parsers against adversarial perturbations plays a crucial role in delivering highly reliable applications. Previous studies along this line primarily focused on perturbations in the natural language question side, neglecting the variability of tables. Motivated by this, we propose the Adversarial Table Perturbation (ATP) as a new attacking paradigm to measure robustness of Text-to-SQL models. Following this proposition, we curate ADVETA, the first robustness evaluation benchmark featuring natural and realistic ATPs. All tested state-of-the-art models experience dramatic performance drops on ADVETA, revealing significant room of improvement. To defense against ATP, we build a systematic adversarial training example generation framework tailored for better contextualization of tabular data. Experiments show that our approach brings models best robustness improvement against ATP, while also substantially boost model robustness against NL-side perturbations. We will release ADVETA and code to facilitate future research.