@inproceedings{gu-etal-2023-language,
title = "Do language models have coherent mental models of everyday things?",
author = "Gu, Yuling and
Dalvi Mishra, Bhavana and
Clark, Peter",
editor = "Rogers, Anna and
Boyd-Graber, Jordan and
Okazaki, Naoaki",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = jul,
year = "2023",
address = "Toronto, Canada",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.106",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.106",
pages = "1892--1913",
abstract = "When people think of everyday things like an egg, they typically have a mental image associated with it. This allows them to correctly judge, for example, that {``}the yolk surrounds the shell{''} is a false statement. Do language models similarly have a coherent picture of such everyday things? To investigate this, we propose a benchmark dataset consisting of 100 everyday things, their parts, and the relationships between these parts, expressed as 11,720 {``}X relation Y?{''} true/false questions. Using these questions as probes, we observe that state-of-the-art pre-trained language models (LMs) like GPT-3 and Macaw have fragments of knowledge about these everyday things, but do not have fully coherent {``}parts mental models{''} (54-59{\%} accurate, 19-43{\%} conditional constraint violation). We propose an extension where we add a constraint satisfaction layer on top of the LM{'}s raw predictions to apply commonsense constraints. As well as removing inconsistencies, we find that this also significantly improves accuracy (by 16-20{\%}), suggesting how the incoherence of the LM{'}s pictures of everyday things can be significantly reduced.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="gu-etal-2023-language">
<titleInfo>
<title>Do language models have coherent mental models of everyday things?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yuling</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Bhavana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dalvi Mishra</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Peter</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Clark</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2023-07</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Anna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rogers</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jordan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Boyd-Graber</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Naoaki</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Okazaki</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Toronto, Canada</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>When people think of everyday things like an egg, they typically have a mental image associated with it. This allows them to correctly judge, for example, that “the yolk surrounds the shell” is a false statement. Do language models similarly have a coherent picture of such everyday things? To investigate this, we propose a benchmark dataset consisting of 100 everyday things, their parts, and the relationships between these parts, expressed as 11,720 “X relation Y?” true/false questions. Using these questions as probes, we observe that state-of-the-art pre-trained language models (LMs) like GPT-3 and Macaw have fragments of knowledge about these everyday things, but do not have fully coherent “parts mental models” (54-59% accurate, 19-43% conditional constraint violation). We propose an extension where we add a constraint satisfaction layer on top of the LM’s raw predictions to apply commonsense constraints. As well as removing inconsistencies, we find that this also significantly improves accuracy (by 16-20%), suggesting how the incoherence of the LM’s pictures of everyday things can be significantly reduced.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">gu-etal-2023-language</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.106</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.106</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2023-07</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>1892</start>
<end>1913</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Do language models have coherent mental models of everyday things?
%A Gu, Yuling
%A Dalvi Mishra, Bhavana
%A Clark, Peter
%Y Rogers, Anna
%Y Boyd-Graber, Jordan
%Y Okazaki, Naoaki
%S Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
%D 2023
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Toronto, Canada
%F gu-etal-2023-language
%X When people think of everyday things like an egg, they typically have a mental image associated with it. This allows them to correctly judge, for example, that “the yolk surrounds the shell” is a false statement. Do language models similarly have a coherent picture of such everyday things? To investigate this, we propose a benchmark dataset consisting of 100 everyday things, their parts, and the relationships between these parts, expressed as 11,720 “X relation Y?” true/false questions. Using these questions as probes, we observe that state-of-the-art pre-trained language models (LMs) like GPT-3 and Macaw have fragments of knowledge about these everyday things, but do not have fully coherent “parts mental models” (54-59% accurate, 19-43% conditional constraint violation). We propose an extension where we add a constraint satisfaction layer on top of the LM’s raw predictions to apply commonsense constraints. As well as removing inconsistencies, we find that this also significantly improves accuracy (by 16-20%), suggesting how the incoherence of the LM’s pictures of everyday things can be significantly reduced.
%R 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.106
%U https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.106
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.106
%P 1892-1913
Markdown (Informal)
[Do language models have coherent mental models of everyday things?](https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.106) (Gu et al., ACL 2023)
ACL