@inproceedings{putra-tokunaga-2017-evaluating,
title = "Evaluating text coherence based on semantic similarity graph",
author = "Putra, Jan Wira Gotama and
Tokunaga, Takenobu",
editor = "Riedl, Martin and
Somasundaran, Swapna and
Glava{\v{s}}, Goran and
Hovy, Eduard",
booktitle = "Proceedings of {T}ext{G}raphs-11: the Workshop on Graph-based Methods for Natural Language Processing",
month = aug,
year = "2017",
address = "Vancouver, Canada",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W17-2410",
doi = "10.18653/v1/W17-2410",
pages = "76--85",
abstract = "Coherence is a crucial feature of text because it is indispensable for conveying its communication purpose and meaning to its readers. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised text coherence scoring based on graph construction in which edges are established between semantically similar sentences represented by vertices. The sentence similarity is calculated based on the cosine similarity of semantic vectors representing sentences. We provide three graph construction methods establishing an edge from a given vertex to a preceding adjacent vertex, to a single similar vertex, or to multiple similar vertices. We evaluated our methods in the document discrimination task and the insertion task by comparing our proposed methods to the supervised (Entity Grid) and unsupervised (Entity Graph) baselines. In the document discrimination task, our method outperformed the unsupervised baseline but could not do the supervised baseline, while in the insertion task, our method outperformed both baselines.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="putra-tokunaga-2017-evaluating">
<titleInfo>
<title>Evaluating text coherence based on semantic similarity graph</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jan</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Wira</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Gotama</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Putra</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Takenobu</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tokunaga</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2017-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of TextGraphs-11: the Workshop on Graph-based Methods for Natural Language Processing</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Martin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Riedl</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Swapna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Somasundaran</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Goran</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Glavaš</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Eduard</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hovy</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Vancouver, Canada</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Coherence is a crucial feature of text because it is indispensable for conveying its communication purpose and meaning to its readers. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised text coherence scoring based on graph construction in which edges are established between semantically similar sentences represented by vertices. The sentence similarity is calculated based on the cosine similarity of semantic vectors representing sentences. We provide three graph construction methods establishing an edge from a given vertex to a preceding adjacent vertex, to a single similar vertex, or to multiple similar vertices. We evaluated our methods in the document discrimination task and the insertion task by comparing our proposed methods to the supervised (Entity Grid) and unsupervised (Entity Graph) baselines. In the document discrimination task, our method outperformed the unsupervised baseline but could not do the supervised baseline, while in the insertion task, our method outperformed both baselines.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">putra-tokunaga-2017-evaluating</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/W17-2410</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W17-2410</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2017-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>76</start>
<end>85</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Evaluating text coherence based on semantic similarity graph
%A Putra, Jan Wira Gotama
%A Tokunaga, Takenobu
%Y Riedl, Martin
%Y Somasundaran, Swapna
%Y Glavaš, Goran
%Y Hovy, Eduard
%S Proceedings of TextGraphs-11: the Workshop on Graph-based Methods for Natural Language Processing
%D 2017
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Vancouver, Canada
%F putra-tokunaga-2017-evaluating
%X Coherence is a crucial feature of text because it is indispensable for conveying its communication purpose and meaning to its readers. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised text coherence scoring based on graph construction in which edges are established between semantically similar sentences represented by vertices. The sentence similarity is calculated based on the cosine similarity of semantic vectors representing sentences. We provide three graph construction methods establishing an edge from a given vertex to a preceding adjacent vertex, to a single similar vertex, or to multiple similar vertices. We evaluated our methods in the document discrimination task and the insertion task by comparing our proposed methods to the supervised (Entity Grid) and unsupervised (Entity Graph) baselines. In the document discrimination task, our method outperformed the unsupervised baseline but could not do the supervised baseline, while in the insertion task, our method outperformed both baselines.
%R 10.18653/v1/W17-2410
%U https://aclanthology.org/W17-2410
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-2410
%P 76-85
Markdown (Informal)
[Evaluating text coherence based on semantic similarity graph](https://aclanthology.org/W17-2410) (Putra & Tokunaga, TextGraphs 2017)
ACL