Recently, language models (LMs) like BERT and large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 have demonstrated potential in various linguistic tasks such as text generation, translation, and sentiment analysis. However, these abilities come with a cost of a risk of perpetuating biases from their training data. Political and economic inclinations play a significant role in shaping these biases. Thus, this research aims to understand political and economic biases in Persian LMs and LLMs, addressing a significant gap in AI ethics and fairness research. Focusing on the Persian language, our research employs a two-step methodology. First, we utilize the political compass test adapted to Persian. Second, we analyze biases present in these models. Our findings indicate the presence of nuanced biases, underscoring the importance of ethical considerations in AI deployments within Persian-speaking contexts.

Natural language processing has advanced with AI-driven language models (LMs), that are applied widely from text generation to question answering. These models are pre-trained on a wide spectrum of data sources, enhancing accuracy and responsiveness. However, this process inadvertently entails the absorption of a diverse spectrum of viewpoints inherent within the training data. Exploring political leaning within LMs due to such viewpoints remains a less-explored domain. In the context of a low-resource language like Bangla, this area of research is nearly non-existent. To bridge this gap, we comprehensively analyze biases present in Bangla language models, specifically focusing on social and economic dimensions. Our findings reveal the inclinations of various LMs, which will provide insights into ethical considerations and limitations associated with deploying Bangla LMs.