Financial misinformation poses a significant threat to investment decisions and market stability. Recently, the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) for detecting financial misinformation has gained considerable attention within the natural language processing (NLP) community. The Financial Misinformation Detection (FMD) challenge @ Coling 2025 serves as a valuable platform for collaboration and innovation. This paper presents our solution to FMD challenge. Our approach involves using search engines to retrieve the summarized high-quality information as supporting evidence and designing a financial domain-specific chain-of-thought to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We evaluated our method on both commercial closed-source LLMs (GPT-family) and open-source models (Llama-3.1-8B and QWen). The experimental results domonstrate that the proposed method improves veracity prediction performance. However, the quality of the generated explanations remains relatively poor. In the paper, we present the experimental findings and provides an in depth analysis of these results.

Despite the promise of large language models based agent framework in stock trading task, their capabilities for comprehensive analysis and multiple different financial assets remain largely unexplored, such as cryptocurrency trading. To evaluate the capabilities of LLM-based agent framework in cryptocurrency trading, we introduce an LLMs-based financial shared task featured at COLING 2025 FinNLP-FNP-LLMFinLegal workshop, named Agent-based Single Cryptocurrency Trading Challenge. This challenge includes two cryptocurrencies: BitCoin and Ethereum. In this paper, we provide an overview of these tasks and datasets, summarize participants’ methods, and present their experimental evaluations, highlighting the effectiveness of LLMs in addressing cryptocurrency trading challenges. To the best of our knowledge, the Agent-based Single Cryptocurrency Trading Challenge is one of the first challenges for assessing LLMs in the financial area. In consequence, we provide detailed observations and take away conclusions for future development in this area.

Peer assessment is an effective and efficient pedagogical strategy for delivering feedback to learners. Asking students to provide quality feedback, which contains suggestions and mentions problems, can promote metacognition by reviewers and better assist reviewees in revising their work. Thus, various supervised machine learning algorithms have been proposed to detect quality feedback. However, all these powerful algorithms have the same Achilles’ heel: the reliance on sufficient historical data. In other words, collecting adequate peer feedback for training a supervised algorithm can take several semesters before the model can be deployed to a new class. In this paper, we present a new paradigm, called incremental zero-shot learning (IZSL), to tackle the problem of lacking sufficient historical data. Our results show that the method can achieve acceptable “cold-start” performance without needing any domain data, and it outperforms BERT when trained on the same data collected incrementally.