@inproceedings{qian-etal-2024-large-language,
title = "Are Large Language Models State-of-the-art Quality Estimators for Machine Translation of User-generated Content?",
author = "Qian, Shenbin and
Orasan, Constantin and
Kanojia, Diptesh and
Do Carmo, F{\'e}lix",
editor = "Nakazawa, Toshiaki and
Goto, Isao",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Asian Translation (WAT 2024)",
month = nov,
year = "2024",
address = "Miami, Florida, USA",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.wat-1.4",
pages = "45--55",
abstract = "This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) are state-of-the-art quality estimators for machine translation of user-generated content (UGC) that contains emotional expressions, without the use of reference translations. To achieve this, we employ an existing emotion-related dataset with human-annotated errors and calculate quality evaluation scores based on the Multi-dimensional Quality Metrics. We compare the accuracy of several LLMs with that of our fine-tuned baseline models, under in-context learning and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) scenarios. We find that PEFT of LLMs leads to better performance in score prediction with human interpretable explanations than fine-tuned models. However, a manual analysis of LLM outputs reveals that they still have problems such as refusal to reply to a prompt and unstable output while evaluating machine translation of UGC.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="qian-etal-2024-large-language">
<titleInfo>
<title>Are Large Language Models State-of-the-art Quality Estimators for Machine Translation of User-generated Content?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shenbin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Qian</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Constantin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Orasan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Diptesh</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kanojia</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Félix</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Do Carmo</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2024-11</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Asian Translation (WAT 2024)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Toshiaki</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Nakazawa</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Isao</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Goto</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Miami, Florida, USA</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) are state-of-the-art quality estimators for machine translation of user-generated content (UGC) that contains emotional expressions, without the use of reference translations. To achieve this, we employ an existing emotion-related dataset with human-annotated errors and calculate quality evaluation scores based on the Multi-dimensional Quality Metrics. We compare the accuracy of several LLMs with that of our fine-tuned baseline models, under in-context learning and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) scenarios. We find that PEFT of LLMs leads to better performance in score prediction with human interpretable explanations than fine-tuned models. However, a manual analysis of LLM outputs reveals that they still have problems such as refusal to reply to a prompt and unstable output while evaluating machine translation of UGC.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">qian-etal-2024-large-language</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2024.wat-1.4</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2024-11</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>45</start>
<end>55</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Are Large Language Models State-of-the-art Quality Estimators for Machine Translation of User-generated Content?
%A Qian, Shenbin
%A Orasan, Constantin
%A Kanojia, Diptesh
%A Do Carmo, Félix
%Y Nakazawa, Toshiaki
%Y Goto, Isao
%S Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Asian Translation (WAT 2024)
%D 2024
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Miami, Florida, USA
%F qian-etal-2024-large-language
%X This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) are state-of-the-art quality estimators for machine translation of user-generated content (UGC) that contains emotional expressions, without the use of reference translations. To achieve this, we employ an existing emotion-related dataset with human-annotated errors and calculate quality evaluation scores based on the Multi-dimensional Quality Metrics. We compare the accuracy of several LLMs with that of our fine-tuned baseline models, under in-context learning and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) scenarios. We find that PEFT of LLMs leads to better performance in score prediction with human interpretable explanations than fine-tuned models. However, a manual analysis of LLM outputs reveals that they still have problems such as refusal to reply to a prompt and unstable output while evaluating machine translation of UGC.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2024.wat-1.4
%P 45-55
Markdown (Informal)
[Are Large Language Models State-of-the-art Quality Estimators for Machine Translation of User-generated Content?](https://aclanthology.org/2024.wat-1.4) (Qian et al., WAT 2024)
ACL