As Large-scale Language Models (LLMs) advance, the development of engaging Role-Playing Conversational Agents (RPCAs) has gained prominence. Despite this progress, there is a notable absence of benchmarks designed around dialogues, rather than question-answering formats, to assess the effectiveness of RPCA interactions. This paper introduces the RAIDEN benchmark, containing a comprehensive dataset specifically developed for RPCA evaluation, comprising over 40,000 multi-turn utterances across 135 characters. The benchmark focuses on assessing particular dimensions at different stages of a conversation, facilitated through interactions conducted by annotators. This approach allows the evaluation phase to concentrate on specific response dimensions, and thus subjectivity in dialogue evaluation is reduced. To further enhance objectivity, evaluators compare responses from two different models rather than assessing a single response in isolation. Besides, we introduce RPCAJudger, a specialized judging LLM tailored for automatic RPCA evaluation. The evaluations conducted by RPCAJudger closely mirror human judgments, and its API-free methodology serves to prevent potential data leakage. All the models and all non-private leaderboard data will be made publicly available.