Mostafa Samir
2020
Multi-dialect Arabic BERT for Country-level Dialect Identification
Bashar Talafha
|
Mohammad Ali
|
Muhy Eddin Za’ter
|
Haitham Seelawi
|
Ibraheem Tuffaha
|
Mostafa Samir
|
Wael Farhan
|
Hussein Al-Natsheh
Proceedings of the Fifth Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop
Arabic dialect identification is a complex problem for a number of inherent properties of the language itself. In this paper, we present the experiments conducted, and the models developed by our competing team, Mawdoo3 AI, along the way to achieving our winning solution to subtask 1 of the Nuanced Arabic Dialect Identification (NADI) shared task. The dialect identification subtask provides 21,000 country-level labeled tweets covering all 21 Arab countries. An unlabeled corpus of 10M tweets from the same domain is also presented by the competition organizers for optional use. Our winning solution itself came in the form of an ensemble of different training iterations of our pre-trained BERT model, which achieved a micro-averaged F1-score of 26.78% on the subtask at hand. We publicly release the pre-trained language model component of our winning solution under the name of Multi-dialect-Arabic-BERT model, for any interested researcher out there.
2019
Mawdoo3 AI at MADAR Shared Task: Arabic Fine-Grained Dialect Identification with Ensemble Learning
Ahmad Ragab
|
Haitham Seelawi
|
Mostafa Samir
|
Abdelrahman Mattar
|
Hesham Al-Bataineh
|
Mohammad Zaghloul
|
Ahmad Mustafa
|
Bashar Talafha
|
Abed Alhakim Freihat
|
Hussein Al-Natsheh
Proceedings of the Fourth Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop
In this paper we discuss several models we used to classify 25 city-level Arabic dialects in addition to Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) as part of MADAR shared task (sub-task 1). We propose an ensemble model of a group of experimentally designed best performing classifiers on a various set of features. Our system achieves an accuracy of 69.3% macro F1-score with an improvement of 1.4% accuracy from the baseline model on the DEV dataset. Our best run submitted model ranked as third out of 19 participating teams on the TEST dataset with only 0.12% macro F1-score behind the top ranked system.
Search