Zhijian Li


2024

pdf bib
Improving NMT from a Low-Resource Source Language: A Use Case from Catalan to Chinese via Spanish
Yongjian Chen | Antonio Toral | Zhijian Li | Mireia Farrús
Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (Volume 1)

The effectiveness of neural machine translation is markedly constrained in low-resource scenarios, where the scarcity of parallel data hampers the development of robust models. This paper focuses on the scenario where the source language is low-resourceand there exists a related high-resource language, for which we introduce a novel approach that combines pivot translation and multilingual training. As a use case we tackle the automatic translation from Catalan to Chinese, using Spanish as an additional language. Our evaluation, conducted on the FLORES-200 benchmark, compares our new approach against a vanilla baseline alongside other models representing various low-resource techniques in the Catalan-to-Chinese context. Experimental results highlight the efficacy of our proposed method, which outperforms existing models, notably demonstrating significant improvements both in translation quality and in lexical diversity.

pdf bib
Generating Hard-Negative Out-of-Scope Data with ChatGPT for Intent Classification
Zhijian Li | Stefan Larson | Kevin Leach
Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)

Intent classifiers must be able to distinguish when a user’s utterance does not belong to any supported intent to avoid producing incorrect and unrelated system responses. Although out-of-scope (OOS) detection for intent classifiers has been studied, previous work has not yet studied changes in classifier performance against hard-negative out-of-scope utterances (i.e., inputs that share common features with in-scope data, but are actually out-of-scope). We present an automated technique to generate hard-negative OOS data using ChatGPT. We use our technique to build five new hard-negative OOS datasets, and evaluate each against three benchmark intent classifiers. We show that classifiers struggle to correctly identify hard-negative OOS utterances more than general OOS utterances. Finally, we show that incorporating hard-negative OOS data for training improves model robustness when detecting hard-negative OOS data and general OOS data. Our technique, datasets, and evaluation address an important void in the field, offering a straightforward and inexpensive way to collect hard-negative OOS data and improve intent classifiers’ robustness.

pdf bib
Your Stereotypical Mileage May Vary: Practical Challenges of Evaluating Biases in Multiple Languages and Cultural Contexts
Karen Fort | Laura Alonso Alemany | Luciana Benotti | Julien Bezançon | Claudia Borg | Marthese Borg | Yongjian Chen | Fanny Ducel | Yoann Dupont | Guido Ivetta | Zhijian Li | Margot Mieskes | Marco Naguib | Yuyan Qian | Matteo Radaelli | Wolfgang S. Schmeisser-Nieto | Emma Raimundo Schulz | Thiziri Saci | Sarah Saidi | Javier Torroba Marchante | Shilin Xie | Sergio E. Zanotto | Aurélie Névéol
Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)

Warning: This paper contains explicit statements of offensive stereotypes which may be upsetting The study of bias, fairness and social impact in Natural Language Processing (NLP) lacks resources in languages other than English. Our objective is to support the evaluation of bias in language models in a multilingual setting. We use stereotypes across nine types of biases to build a corpus containing contrasting sentence pairs, one sentence that presents a stereotype concerning an underadvantaged group and another minimally changed sentence, concerning a matching advantaged group. We build on the French CrowS-Pairs corpus and guidelines to provide translations of the existing material into seven additional languages. In total, we produce 11,139 new sentence pairs that cover stereotypes dealing with nine types of biases in seven cultural contexts. We use the final resource for the evaluation of relevant monolingual and multilingual masked language models. We find that language models in all languages favor sentences that express stereotypes in most bias categories. The process of creating a resource that covers a wide range of language types and cultural settings highlights the difficulty of bias evaluation, in particular comparability across languages and contexts.