Even with various regulations in place across countries and social media platforms (Government of India, 2021; European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2022), digital abusive speech remains a significant issue. One potential approach to address this challenge is automatic text detoxification, a text style transfer (TST) approach that transforms toxic language into a more neutral or non-toxic form. To date, the availability of parallel corpora for the text detoxification task (Logacheva et al., 2022; Atwell et al., 2022; Dementieva et al., 2024a) has proven to be crucial for state-of-the-art approaches. With this work, we extend parallel text detoxification corpus to new languages—German, Chinese, Arabic, Hindi, and Amharic—testing in the extensive multilingual setup TST baselines. Next, we conduct the first of its kind an automated, explainable analysis of the descriptive features of both toxic and non-toxic sentences, diving deeply into the nuances, similarities, and differences of toxicity and detoxification across 9 languages. Finally, based on the obtained insights, we experiment with a novel text detoxification method inspired by the Chain-of-Thoughts reasoning approach, enhancing the prompting process through clustering on relevant descriptive attributes.

Despite the increasing popularity of multilingualism within the NLP community, numerous languages continue to be underrepresented due to the lack of available resources.Our work addresses this gap by introducing experiments on cross-lingual transfer between 158 high-resource (HR) and 31 low-resource (LR) languages.We mainly focus on extremely LR languages, some of which are first presented in research works.Across 158*31 HR–LR language pairs, we investigate how continued pretraining on different HR languages affects the mT5 model’s performance in representing LR languages in the LM setup.Our findings surprisingly reveal that the optimal language pairs with improved performance do not necessarily align with direct linguistic motivations, with subtoken overlap playing a more crucial role. Our investigation indicates that specific languages tend to be almost universally beneficial for pretraining (super donors), while others benefit from pretraining with almost any language (super recipients). This pattern recurs in various setups and is unrelated to the linguistic similarity of HR-LR pairs.Furthermore, we perform evaluation on two downstream tasks, part-of-speech (POS) tagging and machine translation (MT), showing how HR pretraining affects LR language performance.