The size of neural models within natural language processing has increased at a rapid pace in recent years.With this increase in model size comes an increase in the amount of training data required for training.While these larger models have shown strong performance, their use comes with added training and data costs, can be resource-prohibitive for many researchers, and uses an amount of language data that is not always available for all languages.This work focuses on exploring quality estimation as a method of data selection or filtering.The aim is to provide models with higher quality data as compared to larger amounts of data.This approach was applied to machine translation models with varying data sizes as well as to the BabyLM Challenge.Given the 100M word dataset provided in the BabyLM Challenge, we test out various strategies for selecting 10M words for pretraining and use a curriculum learning approach based on the quality estimation scoring.We find small improvements in certain data settings.

Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) is a semantic graph formalism designed to capture sentence meaning using a directed graph. Many systems treat AMR-to-text generation as a sequence-to-sequence problem, drawing upon existing models. The largest AMR dataset (AMR 3.0) provides a sequence format which is considered equivalent to the graph format. However, due to the position-sensitive nature of sequence-to-sequence models, graph traversal order affects system performance. In this work we explore the effect that different, valid orderings have on the performance of sequence-to-sequence AMR-to-text systems and find that changing the traversal order can result in a BLEU score drop of up to 17.5 on a state-of-the-art system.

Rhetoric, both spoken and written, involves not only content but also style. One common stylistic tool is parallelism: the juxtaposition of phrases which have the same sequence of linguistic (e.g., phonological, syntactic, semantic) features. Despite the ubiquity of parallelism, the field of natural language processing has seldom investigated it, missing a chance to better understand the nature of the structure, meaning, and intent that humans convey. To address this, we introduce the task of rhetorical parallelism detection. We construct a formal definition of it; we provide one new Latin dataset and one adapted Chinese dataset for it; we establish a family of metrics to evaluate performance on it; and, lastly, we create baseline systems and novel sequence labeling schemes to capture it. On our strictest metric, we attain F₁ scores of 0.40 and 0.43 on our Latin and Chinese datasets, respectively.

Most work on part-of-speech (POS) tagging is focused on high resource languages, or examines low-resource and active learning settings through simulated studies. We evaluate POS tagging techniques on an actual endangered language, Griko. We present a resource that contains 114 narratives in Griko, along with sentence-level translations in Italian, and provides gold annotations for the test set. Based on a previously collected small corpus, we investigate several traditional methods, as well as methods that take advantage of monolingual data or project cross-lingual POS tags. We show that the combination of a semi-supervised method with cross-lingual transfer is more appropriate for this extremely challenging setting, with the best tagger achieving an accuracy of 72.9%. With an applied active learning scheme, which we use to collect sentence-level annotations over the test set, we achieve improvements of more than 21 percentage points.