Minh Ngoc Ta


2025

pdf bib
GenAI Content Detection Task 1: English and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection: AI vs. Human
Yuxia Wang | Artem Shelmanov | Jonibek Mansurov | Akim Tsvigun | Vladislav Mikhailov | Rui Xing | Zhuohan Xie | Jiahui Geng | Giovanni Puccetti | Ekaterina Artemova | Jinyan Su | Minh Ngoc Ta | Mervat Abassy | Kareem Ashraf Elozeiri | Saad El Dine Ahmed El Etter | Maiya Goloburda | Tarek Mahmoud | Raj Vardhan Tomar | Nurkhan Laiyk | Osama Mohammed Afzal | Ryuto Koike | Masahiro Kaneko | Alham Fikri Aji | Nizar Habash | Iryna Gurevych | Preslav Nakov
Proceedings of the 1stWorkshop on GenAI Content Detection (GenAIDetect)

We present the GenAI Content Detection Task 1 – a shared task on binary machine generated text detection, conducted as a part of the GenAI workshop at COLING 2025. The task consists of two subtasks: Monolingual (English) and Multilingual. The shared task attracted many participants: 36 teams made official submissions to the Monolingual subtask during the test phase and 27 teams – to the Multilingual. We provide a comprehensive overview of the data, a summary of the results – including system rankings and performance scores – detailed descriptions of the participating systems, and an in-depth analysis of submissions.

2024

pdf bib
LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection
Mervat Abassy | Kareem Elozeiri | Alexander Aziz | Minh Ngoc Ta | Raj Vardhan Tomar | Bimarsha Adhikari | Saad El Dine Ahmed | Yuxia Wang | Osama Mohammed Afzal | Zhuohan Xie | Jonibek Mansurov | Ekaterina Artemova | Vladislav Mikhailov | Rui Xing | Jiahui Geng | Hasan Iqbal | Zain Muhammad Mujahid | Tarek Mahmoud | Akim Tsvigun | Alham Fikri Aji | Artem Shelmanov | Nizar Habash | Iryna Gurevych | Preslav Nakov
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations

The ease of access to large language models (LLMs) has enabled a widespread of machine-generated texts, and now it is often hard to tell whether a piece of text was human-written or machine-generated. This raises concerns about potential misuse, particularly within educational and academic domains. Thus, it is important to develop practical systems that can automate the process. Here, we present one such system, LLM-DetectAIve, designed for fine-grained detection. Unlike most previous work on machine-generated text detection, which focused on binary classification, LLM-DetectAIve supports four categories: (i) human-written, (ii) machine-generated, (iii) machine-written, then machine-humanized, and (iv) human-written, then machine-polished. Category (iii) aims to detect attempts to obfuscate the fact that a text was machine-generated, while category (iv) looks for cases where the LLM was used to polish a human-written text, which is typically acceptable in academic writing, but not in education. Our experiments show that LLM-DetectAIve can effectively identify the above four categories, which makes it a potentially useful tool in education, academia, and other domains.LLM-DetectAIve is publicly accessible at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/LLM-DetectAIve. The video describing our system is available at https://youtu.be/E8eT_bE7k8c.