2024
pdf
bib
abs
KARL: Knowledge-Aware Retrieval and Representations aid Retention and Learning in Students
Matthew Shu
|
Nishant Balepur
|
Shi Feng
|
Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Flashcard schedulers rely on 1) *student models* to predict the flashcards a student knows; and 2) *teaching policies* to pick which cards to show next via these predictions.Prior student models, however, just use study data like the student’s past responses, ignoring the text on cards. We propose **content-aware scheduling**, the first schedulers exploiting flashcard content.To give the first evidence that such schedulers enhance student learning, we build KARL, a simple but effective content-aware student model employing deep knowledge tracing (DKT), retrieval, and BERT to predict student recall.We train KARL by collecting a new dataset of 123,143 study logs on diverse trivia questions.KARL bests existing student models in AUC and calibration error.To ensure our improved predictions lead to better student learning, we create a novel delta-based teaching policy to deploy KARL online.Based on 32 study paths from 27 users, KARL improves learning efficiency over SOTA, showing KARL’s strength and encouraging researchers to look beyond historical study data to fully capture student abilities.
pdf
bib
abs
A SMART Mnemonic Sounds like “Glue Tonic”: Mixing LLMs with Student Feedback to Make Mnemonic Learning Stick
Nishant Balepur
|
Matthew Shu
|
Alexander Hoyle
|
Alison Robey
|
Shi Feng
|
Seraphina Goldfarb-Tarrant
|
Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Keyword mnemonics are memorable explanations that link new terms to simpler keywords.Prior work generates mnemonics for students, but they do not train models using mnemonics students prefer and aid learning.We build SMART, a mnemonic generator trained on feedback from real students learning new terms.To train SMART, we first fine-tune LLaMA-2 on a curated set of user-written mnemonics.We then use LLM alignment to enhance SMART: we deploy mnemonics generated by SMART in a flashcard app to find preferences on mnemonics students favor.We gather 2684 preferences from 45 students across two types: **expressed** (inferred from ratings) and **observed** (inferred from student learning), yielding three key findings.First, expressed and observed preferences disagree; what students *think* is helpful does not always capture what is *truly* helpful.Second, Bayesian models can synthesize complementary data from multiple preference types into a single effectiveness signal.SMART is tuned via Direct Preference Optimization on this signal, which resolves ties and missing labels in the typical method of pairwise comparisons, augmenting data for LLM output quality gains. Third, mnemonic experts assess SMART as matching GPT-4 at much lower deployment costs, showing the utility of capturing diverse student feedback to align LLMs in education.
pdf
bib
abs
You Make me Feel like a Natural Question: Training QA Systems on Transformed Trivia Questions
Tasnim Kabir
|
Yoo Yeon Sung
|
Saptarashmi Bandyopadhyay
|
Hao Zou
|
Abhranil Chandra
|
Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Training question-answering QA and information retrieval systems for web queries require large, expensive datasets that are difficult to annotate and time-consuming to gather. Moreover, while natural datasets of information-seeking questions are often prone to ambiguity or ill-formed, there are troves of freely available, carefully crafted question datasets for many languages. Thus, we automatically generate shorter, information-seeking questions, resembling web queries in the style of the Natural Questions (NQ) dataset from longer trivia data. Training a QA system on these transformed questions is a viable strategy for alternating to more expensive training setups showing the F1 score difference of less than six points and contrasting the final systems.
pdf
bib
abs
Do great minds think alike? Investigating Human-AI Complementarity in Question Answering with CAIMIRA
Maharshi Gor
|
Hal Daumé Iii
|
Tianyi Zhou
|
Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Recent advancements of large language models (LLMs)have led to claims of AI surpassing humansin natural language processing NLP tasks such as textual understanding and reasoning.%This work investigates these assertions by introducingCAIMIRA, a novel framework rooted in item response theory IRTthat enables quantitative assessment and comparison of problem-solving abilities inquestion-answering QA agents.%Through analysis of over 300,000 responses from ~ 70 AI systemsand 155 humans across thousands of quiz questions, CAIMIRA uncovers distinctproficiency patterns in knowledge domains and reasoning skills. %Humans outperform AI systems in knowledge-grounded abductive and conceptual reasoning,while state-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 Turbo and Llama-3-70B demonstrate superior performance ontargeted information retrieval and fact-based reasoning, particularly when information gapsare well-defined and addressable through pattern matching or data retrieval.%These findings identify key areas for future QA tasks and model development,highlighting the critical need for questions that not only challengehigher-order reasoning and scientific thinking, but also demand nuanced linguisticand cross-contextual application.
pdf
bib
abs
AutoHallusion: Automatic Generation of Hallucination Benchmarks for Vision-Language Models
Xiyang Wu
|
Tianrui Guan
|
Dianqi Li
|
Shuaiyi Huang
|
Xiaoyu Liu
|
Xijun Wang
|
Ruiqi Xian
|
Abhinav Shrivastava
|
Furong Huang
|
Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber
|
Tianyi Zhou
|
Dinesh Manocha
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are prone to hallucinations, where certain contextual cues in an image can trigger the language module to produce overconfident and incorrect reasoning about abnormal or hypothetical objects. While some benchmarks have been developed to investigate LVLM hallucinations, they often rely on hand-crafted corner cases whose failure patterns may not generalize well. Additionally, fine-tuning on these examples could undermine their validity. To address this, we aim to scale up the number of cases through an automated approach, reducing human bias in crafting such corner cases. This motivates the development of AutoHallusion, the first automated benchmark generation approach that employs several key strategies to create a diverse range of hallucination examples. Our generated visual-question pairs pose significant challenges to LVLMs, requiring them to overcome contextual biases and distractions to arrive at correct answers. AutoHallusion enables us to create new benchmarks at the minimum cost and thus overcomes the fragility of hand-crafted benchmarks. It also reveals common failure patterns and reasons, providing key insights to detect, avoid, or control hallucinations. Comprehensive evaluations of top-tier LVLMs, e.g., GPT-4V(ision), Gemini Pro Vision, Claude 3, and LLaVA-1.5, show a 97.7% and 98.7% success rate of hallucination induction on synthetic and real-world datasets of AutoHallusion, paving the way for a long battle against hallucinations. The codebase and data can be accessed at https://github.com/wuxiyang1996/AutoHallusion
pdf
bib
abs
PEDANTS: Cheap but Effective and Interpretable Answer Equivalence
Zongxia Li
|
Ishani Mondal
|
Huy Nghiem
|
Yijun Liang
|
Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024
Question answering (QA) can only make progress if we know if an answer is correct, but current answer correctness (AC) metrics struggle with verbose, free-form answers from large language models (LLMs). There are two challenges with current short-form QA evaluations: a lack of diverse styles of evaluation data and an over-reliance on expensive and slow LLMs. LLM-based scorers correlate better with humans, but this expensive task has only been tested on limited QA datasets. We rectify these issues by providing rubrics and datasets for evaluating machine QA adopted from the Trivia community. We also propose an efficient, and interpretable QA evaluation that is more stable than an exact match and neural methods (BERTScore).
pdf
bib
abs
SciDoc2Diagrammer-MAF: Towards Generation of Scientific Diagrams from Documents guided by Multi-Aspect Feedback Refinement
Ishani Mondal
|
Zongxia Li
|
Yufang Hou
|
Anandhavelu Natarajan
|
Aparna Garimella
|
Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024
Automating the creation of scientific diagrams from academic papers can significantly streamline the development of tutorials, presentations, and posters, thereby saving time and accelerating the process. Current text-to-image models (Rombach et al., 2022a; Belouadi et al., 2023) struggle with generating accurate and visually appealing diagrams from long-context inputs. We propose SciDoc2Diagram, a task that extracts relevant information from scientific papers and generates diagrams, along with a benchmarking dataset, SciDoc2DiagramBench. We develop a multi-step pipeline SciDoc2Diagrammer that generates diagrams based on user intentions using intermediate code generation. We observed that initial diagram drafts were often incomplete or unfaithful to the source, leading us to develop SciDoc2Diagrammer-Multi-Aspect-Feedback (MAF), a refinement strategy that significantly enhances factual correctness and visual appeal and outperforms existing models on both automatic and human judgement.